8 – 13 – 18 Love = Super Manly (3 minutes)


One of the things I’ve observed here in Ethiopia that I love about their culture is the prevalence of physical affection. Shaking hands is not just for introductions, nearly every time you see someone you make physical contact with them. A person you know is never just something you see, you feel them every time you interact.
Men who are closer will shake hands then lean in and bump their shoulders together. It looks a little strange at first, but it’s so much more affectionate than a handshake. Partly because it takes longer, partly because you can shake someone’s hand with your faces four feet apart, but you brush ears if you’re bumping shoulders.
When men are walking together they are hanging all over each other. Holding hands, an arm around a shoulder, one holding another’s wrist. It’s a bit shocking to see at first, especially coming from America, the no-touch zone.
It’s been refreshing for me seeing this culture, as I’ve always been touchy. My mom would say that my primary love language is physical affection, for anyone familiar with the five love languages.
I don’t know if it’s because of homophobia, or individualism, or that we are a settler nation and therefore not sharing in a culture as strongly as someplace like Ethiopia, but this kind of physical affection between men is somewhat taboo, or at least perceived as effeminate.
It’s a small thing, what does it matter that men rarely hug in the US? I confess it may not matter if you subscribe to Cartesian Dualism, that we’re just souls inside bodies. I think maybe fewer of us really believe that than we think though. If we did, all physical affection is meaningless. To kiss your lover or child is nothing more than to press the husk that contains your soul against the husk that contains their soul. More like making two robots touch than expressing love. (I stole that but I couldn’t find the original author.)
But if you believe that we are our bodies and our souls in a kind of mysterious union that I’m not theologically educated enough to explain, we see that what we do with our bodies matters. (Just google theology of the body if you’re intrigued by that idea.) So I think that the reluctance that I see among male friends to speak tender words to each other, to bare their hearts to each other, to tell their dearest friends that they love them is thoroughly intertwined with this reluctance to engage in physical affection.
If you’re Christian then your pinnacle of masculinity must be Christ. Now granted Jesus lived in a very different culture than us, but he’s kissing everybody in the Gospels! His words and actions towards those he loves express his affection in a way that is so vulnerable and confident that it indicts me in the coolness I treat my loved ones with.
And his greatest act of love, the greatest expression of his affection for us is intensely physical. He undergoes scourging, crucifixion, and death as an expression of his love. How many times does he show that he loves us? In the healings, in the teachings, in direct expressions of that sentiment? But what sticks with us, what is the symbol that most sums up what our faith is all about? It is what he did with his body, not his words.
Perhaps this is simply the biased reasoning of someone who’s made people uncomfortable with his “hugginess” before and been scolded by elementary and middle school teachers to keep my hands to myself. But if you believe as I do that we are our bodies and that physical affection matters I enjoin you when you next see those you consider your brothers and sisters to “greet one another with a holy kiss.”
Okay, that might freak them out. But give somebody a hug and tell them you love them, preferably someone you know.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

8 - 11 - 17 Dogs are Better than People? (5 minutes)

“Whoever wishes to come after me must deny himself, take up his cross, and follow me.” We are not asked to deny our cravings. Neither are we asked to deny our vices. We are not asked to gain further resolve in the pursuit of holiness in order to deny any of our own weaknesses. We are asked to deny the totality of our current selves in preference for the new self Christ will fashion within us. I’ve written before about how Christ’s call is not just a new moral standard. If it were it would be an impossible one. It seems to me that the Christian vision of discipleship is actually quite different than that of the Jewish, though this is only in my perception and I am quite ignorant of Judaism as it extends beyond the Old Testament. It is less about behaving a certain way than it is about having a certain state of being. All our righteous actions garner some of their value in that they have a tendency to move us closer to the type of being God desires us to be. I’m not saying t
Read more

6 – 20 – 17 Be Ye Perfect

Link to Daily Readings “So be ye perfect, just as your Heavenly Father is perfect.” A tall order to say the least. Quite impossible to be sure. But I think this is the idea. I think part of what Jesus is trying to communicate in this command is not only that he understands how difficult our task is, but that he wants us to understand that it is not possible for us to achieve it on our own. Many people are capable of pure, perfect acts. A moment of divine unselfishness that will likely sing in the memory of the person they helped as an example of Christ on earth. To string two together, without stopping to think about how good of a person I am? Now that’s quite a bit more difficult. Once we get into the span of ten minutes, one hour, the prospect becomes quite hopeless. To think of living a perfect day is quite laughable. That’s one thing I always thought was interesting about striving for moral perfection. We truly do have the ability, just not the endurance. It’s as tho
Read more

6 - 23 - 17 Jesus is Smarter than Drake

6 – 23 – 17 Link to Daily Readings This passage contains Jesus proclaiming that He is the only path to the Father, that He is the only method of salvation for all human souls. There probably couldn’t be a more important thing in the universe. In this passage He also says, “I am meek and humble of heart.” Which seems like quite the contradiction when we consider these two ideas together, but we are thinking of our human experience. Jesus does not need to boast, firstly it would not be in his nature, secondly there is nothing he would desire to lay claim to being that He is not. In this passage He is simply telling his disciples about the nature of His ministry, expressing to them the importance of not only Himself, but his teachings. I think this distinction is what makes these statements feel contradictory to each other when they in fact are not. Most other times we have heard someone boast on that level, of being all-powerful or the very, very best at something it is eit
Read more